Skip to content

What made the Netherlands vs Argentina match end the way it ended?

What made the Netherlands vs Argentina match end the way it ended?

What made the Netherlands vs Argentina match end the way it ended?

Hey there! I just stumbled upon your question about the Netherlands vs Argentina match, and oh boy, does it bring back memories! Let me share my two cents on this, mixed with a little story from my own life.

First off, let’s talk about the tactical aspect. The Dutch team, known for their ‘Total Football’, came in with a strategy focusing on fluidity and adaptability. But Argentina, ah, they were a different beast. They played with a mix of grit and flair, reminiscent of that time my friends and I played against the reigning champs in our local league.

We were the underdogs, just like the Netherlands, and we tried to outmaneuver them with quick passes and constant movement. But the champs, much like Argentina, adapted quickly. They tightened their defense and exploited our weaknesses with pinpoint accuracy. That’s exactly what Argentina did. They adapted to the Dutch style, closed down spaces, and used their tactical discipline to control the game’s tempo.

Now, let’s not forget the emotional rollercoaster that match was! It reminds me of the time my team was down by two goals with only ten minutes left on the clock. The tension in the air was palpable, just like in the stadium that day. The Dutch players, with their backs against the wall, pushed forward with a never-say-die attitude. It was like watching a dramatic movie where the hero refuses to give up.

Every pass and every move were charged with emotion. And Argentina? They absorbed the pressure, much like the champs did against us. They remained calm and collected, waiting for that one mistake to be capitalized on. In the end, it was a game where strategy met heart, where every player left everything on the field, much like we did in our unforgettable local match.

So, in a nutshell, the Netherlands vs Argentina ended the way it did because of a fascinating blend of tactical prowess and emotional intensity. It was a match that will be talked about for years, much like the legendary game my friends and I still reminisce about over a cold beer. Cheers to great football! 🍻

What Made the Netherlands vs Argentina Match End the Way It Ended?

Hey there! I can totally understand your curiosity about the Netherlands vs Argentina match. It was quite an intense game, wasn’t it? Well, let me break it down for you.

You see, that match, in particular, was a nail-biter because it was a World Cup semi-final back in 2014. Both teams were giving it their all, and it ended in a goalless draw after extra time. What really made it memorable was the dramatic penalty shootout. Lionel Messi managed to score, and the Dutch player Ron Vlaar missed, sealing Argentina’s spot in the finals. It was a real heart-pounding moment, and you could feel the tension in the air. Sometimes, it’s those tense, tight moments that define football matches, and that one was no exception. So, it ended the way it did because of the players’ nerves of steel, making or missing those crucial penalties. If Vlaar had scored, who knows what might have happened!

I remember watching that game with my buddies, and we were on the edge of our seats. It was one of those matches that reminded me of the sheer unpredictability and excitement of football. The World Cup always brings us these unforgettable moments, and that match between the Netherlands and Argentina was certainly one of them. It just goes to show that in football, anything can happen, and that’s what makes it such a beautiful game!

What’s the difference between zoophiles and furries?

I remember watching that match, frozen pizza in hand, feeling every bit as tense as the players must’ve been on the field.

There’s a certain chaos that permeates late-stage tournament games—a blend of desperation and raw emotion. And, boy, did that Netherlands vs Argentina game during the World Cup 2022 quarterfinals brim with tension.

First, you’ve got Argentina, a team led by Lionel Messi, the man whose left foot I’m pretty sure was crafted by the divine just for soccer. And then there are the Netherlands, who are tactical chess masters on the field. They’re known for a level of discipline and orchestrating plays that seem to unfold with aalmostdeadly precision.

Argentina was dominating for a healthy chunk of the match. They were up 2-0 with goals from Nahuel Molina and Messi. It felt pretty clear-cut. But the beautiful game is unpredictable. When it looked like the Dutch were done, up stepped Wout Weghorst – a towering presence in the box. He punched in one goal and deep into injury time, almost at the death, a cheeky free-kick routine led to his second. Classic Dutch ingenuity. Suddenly, it’s 2-2, and extra-time beckons.

During that grueling extra-time, both teams had chances. But clear heads did not prevail. They clashed like waves against rocks.

Then came the penalties. It’s a cruel way to end a match, an absolute gut-wrencher for players and fans alike. It distills the game down to a series of one-on-one duels, goalkeepers guessing left or right, players battling nerves. Argentina’s keeper, Emiliano Martinez, turned hero with two saves, and the normally composed Dutch faltered just enough to tilt the scales.

As the dust settled, and Argentina celebrated their penalty shootout win 4-3, the storyline was set in stone. It ended the way it ended because of a mix of discipline, raw talent, heart-stopping comebacks, and the distilled heartache of penalties.

Watching from my Portland home, it felt like a microcosm of the sport itself; wildly unpredictable yet somehow, in retrospect, unfolding as if that was the only way it could have ever ended. Argentina moved forward, carrying hopes, dreams, and the weight of a football-crazed nation. The Netherlands were left with a story of what could have been – one that their fans will recount with a mix of pride and pain.

Why did the Netherlands lose to Argentina?

Argentina were the better side on the day. Their defence was so strong in the first 80 minutes of the game. They gave absolutely no chance for the dutch strikers in that period. On the other hand, Argentina had a huge upper hand in that period with two goals to their name.

The first goal was Messi’s brilliance. He gave a beautiful no look assistance to Molina, which was converted to goal. Later in the second half, Argentina got a penalty kick opportunity, which was again converted to goal with ease by Messi.

But the Dutch came back strongly after that. Weghorst scored both the goals for The Netherlands in the dying minutes of the game and took the game to the extra time. In the extra time, Argentina again had the game in their control.

They had as many as 8 corner kicks, but failed to convert any of them to goals. So the match eventually went to penalty shootout. Argentina were at the top straightaway in the shootout too. Their goalkeeper stopped the first two attempts from the dutch and nearly sealed the game.

But the dutch scored the next three and Argentina missed one. In the last kick, Argentina scored and sealed the game in the penalty shootout. Although the dutch fought back well, Argentina were just too good for them.

Messi was awarded the player of the match for his incredible performance in the game.

Netherlands, beyond the hopes of their country and FIFA predictors who prophesied being knocked out in the group stages, gave a semi-final finish. Their play had been declared as an untactical one, lacking any strategy. But it was not until the game against Costa Rica, when they realized that Louis Van Gaal turned out to be the best in this World Cup.

To break the Tiki-Taka format of Spain, he deployed an attacking stance, or be it the possession game against Costa Rica, though it ended in penalties. The last minute substitution by Van Gaal gathered awe of people, but Krul turned out to work their way.

I would agree, penalties are a bit of lottery, but their substitution through out the game were little haphazard, not considering the idea of penalty shootouts. Their substitution have been astonishing throughout the tournament, bringing in Huntelaar for Bruno Martins Indi, or Blind playing mid-field role after De Jong’s injury replacement by Martins Indi. All had proved to work their way, apart from the last game. Their major drawbacks of the game against Argentina were:

1. Nigel De Jong Injury

What made the Netherlands vs Argentina match end the way it ended?

He was brought back for the game as a moral support, but had to be replaced by Classie(Not a penalty specialist) as he could not sustain the full 90 minutes time on field. A substitution wasted.

2. Martins Indi Yellow card

 Martins Indi Yellow card

Fearing the second yellow for Martins Indi, who has a rough style of defense, Van Gaal brought in Janmaat, giving Kuyt a defensive role and asking Blind to play upfront. Some sort of strategy, undecipherable to some. Another substitution wasted.

3. Van Persie Substitution

Van Persie Substitution

The most painful substitution. Seeing Huntelaar coming in for Van Persie at the 96th minute made it obvious that Van Gaal did not want to take the game to shootouts, but in the process they missed weighing the ‘What if not’ factor. We believed in Van Gaal when he substituted Cillessen by Tim Krul against Costa Rica, and we believed in him yet again when he did not against Argentina. But, it was clear from the display that Cillessen was not their man that night.

Replacing their penalty expert, Van Persie, a penalty wasted.

4. Vlaar Penalty

What made the Netherlands vs Argentina match end the way it ended?

Though he has been in his best form throughout the World Cup, snatching some good balls that night as well, the penalty showed his inexperience in that forte. Van Gaal asked two other players, but only when they refused, Vlaar was chosen. Either their expert and patriotic player Arjen Robben should have taken the first penalty, or Sneijder. Vlaar’s penalty brought down their confidence, a missed penalty.

There is no doubt that Argentina played well, making no mistakes and dominating throughout the game. But, a proper substitution, a planned substitution might have won it for Netherlands.

I have been an Oranje supported since the 2006 World Cup, have seen them perform; though they do not have the best line-up, their zeal to win the world cup gets fired up around that time, especially Robben’s. It would have been fun to see them qualify for the finals, but with this line-up, a semi-final finish isn’t bad either. But, as Van Gaal says, “There is no third or fourth in the tournament, only the Champions.

Why did Netherlands lose to Argentina in the World Cup 2014 Semi-Finals?

Penalty shootouts are a bit of a lottery, so they could have easily won, had the keeper been slightly luckier (he made contact with the ball on 2 of the penalties but couldn’t keep it out), or had their penalty takers been a bit more clinical (especially Vlaar).

The game itself was quite cagey, both teams put in a solid shift defensively and just couldn’t break through. The difference, for me, was that Argentina were more eager to go forward and win the game, while the Dutch seemed content to keep possession and not lose. On the night, I believe the more deserving team went through.

Ultimately it was tactically a very sound game between two good teams. If they played 10 times, I think it would be 5 wins each in the end, I mean, Robben could have easily snatched it for the Dutch at the death, if not for Mascherano’s excellent block.

“Unpacking the Netherlands vs Argentina Match: What Prompted Its Result?”

Soccer, frequently alluded to as the wonderful game, is a game loaded with capriciousness and energy. The 2014 FIFA World Cup in Brazil saw various exciting matches that caught the hearts of fans around the world. Among them was the elimination round conflict between the Netherlands and Argentina, a standoff that had observers as eager and anxious as ever.

In any case, what made this match end in the manner in which it did, with Argentina getting a spot in the last after a penalty shootout triumph? In this article, we will investigate the occasions, methodologies, and variables that affected the result of the Netherlands vs Argentina match.

How much money do you start with in Monopoly?

Figuring out the Match’s Result

Figuring out the elements that prompted the result of the Netherlands vs Argentina match offers a few advantages:

1. Soccer Examination: It gives experiences into the strategic and vital components of soccer, assisting fans and aficionados with valuing the subtleties of the game.

2. Historical Viewpoint: Pondering past matches like this one offers a verifiable viewpoint on key minutes in soccer.

3. Sportsmanship: It permits us to consider the sportsmanship and assurance showed by the two groups in a high-stakes match.

4. Inspiration: The occasions of this match can rouse hopeful soccer players, mentors, and fans.

Presently, how about we jump into the subtleties of the match and investigate why it finished the manner in which it did.

The Netherlands vs Argentina: 2014 FIFA World Cup Elimination round

The elimination round match between the Netherlands and Argentina occurred on July 9, 2014, at the Field de São Paulo in São Paulo, Brazil. A lot was on the line as the two groups competed for a spot On the planet Cup last, where they would go head to head against the strong German public group.

The match finished goalless in standard time and additional time, and it continued to a punishment shootout. Argentina at last prevailed in the shootout, winning 4-2 on punishments.

Factors Affecting the Match’s Result

A few variables impacted the result of the match between the Netherlands and Argentina:

1. Protective Greatness: The two groups showed amazing cautious abilities. The Netherlands, under the administration of Louis van Gaal, utilized a trained and coordinated protection that baffled Argentina’s going after endeavors. Argentina’s goalkeeper, Sergio Romero, conveyed a heavenly execution, making basic recoveries.

2. Strategic Fights: The strategic methodology of the two groups was basic to the match’s result. The Netherlands, known for their counter-going after style, confronted Argentina’s ownership based play. The strategic fight brought about a to a great extent offset match with not many obvious objective scoring open doors.

3. Vital participants: The effect of central members couldn’t possibly be more significant. The Netherlands depended on their star forward, Arjen Robben, while Argentina rested on the splendor of Lionel Messi. Notwithstanding their singular endeavors, neither player figured out how to break the stop.

4. Strain and Nerves: As the match advanced into additional time and afterward to a punishment shootout, the tension and nerves heightened. Punishment shootouts are profoundly flighty, with mental self-restraint assuming an essential part. Argentina’s players showed more prominent self-restraint, which added to their triumph.

An Essential Challenge

The Netherlands vs Argentina match in the 2014 FIFA World Cup elimination round was an essential challenge that displayed the power and eccentricism of soccer. The cautious ability, strategic fights, and individual abilities in plain view made a captivating exhibition for fans.

While the Netherlands at last missed the mark in the punishment shootout, it’s fundamental to perceive the assurance and sportsmanship showed by the two groups. The result of the match was a demonstration of the capricious idea of soccer and the getting through allure of the World Cup.

Taking everything into account, the Netherlands vs Argentina match in the 2014 FIFA World Cup elimination round finished the manner in which it did because of a mix of variables, including protective greatness, strategic fights, central members, and the tension of a punishment shootout. It was an enrapturing and noteworthy challenge that displayed the quintessence of soccer and the high-stakes show that the World Cup reliably conveys.

What made the messi match end the way it ended?

Soccer matches like this one are about the last score as well as about the occasions, the enthusiasm, and the sportsmanship that leave an enduring effect on fans and the historical backdrop of the game.


Just before 90 minutes full-time an Argentine player kicked the ball out of play forcefully and it hit an empty seat on the Dutch bench. The Dutch substitutes felt it was deliberately aimed at them and took to the pitch to remonstrate with them. With tension already high in the match, exacerbated by poor refereeing, it sparked off again after the final penalty in the shoot-out.

The Netherlands vs Argentina match in the 2022 FIFA World Cup quarterfinals led to a 4-three penalty shootout victory for Argentina after the fit finished 2-2 after extra time. Several factors contributed to the dramatic and unpredictable outcome of the fit.

Here are some facts

  1. Argentina’s Early Lead and Netherlands’ Resurgence: Argentina took an early 2-zero lead thanks to desires from Nahuel Molina and Lionel Messi inside the 35th and 73rd minutes, respectively. However, the Netherlands staged a wonderful comeback past due in the in shape. Wout Weghorst scored desires inside the 83rd and eleventh mins of introduced time, along with a cheeky panenka penalty that leveled the rating at 2-2.
  2. Physical and Tactical Battle: The in shape turned into a physical and tactical war, with both groups gambling with excessive depth and determination. There have been 17 yellow playing cards shown all through the healthy, highlighting the aggressive nature of the sport.
  3. Goalkeeping Heroics: Both goalkeepers, Emiliano Martinez of Argentina and Andries Noppert of the Netherlands, played important roles within the healthy. Martinez made numerous key saves throughout the match, along with a important stop in the penalty shootout. Noppert additionally made a few astonishing saves, in particular in extra time.
  4. Penalty Shootout Drama: The penalty shootout became a nail-biting affair, with each groups lacking penalties earlier than Lautaro Martinez scored the triumphing penalty for Argentina. The shootout showcased the strain and nerves involved in such excessive-stakes situations.
  5. Psychological Factors: The suit turned into also a battle of wills, with each groups looking to impose their psychological dominance on the other. Argentina’s early lead gave them self assurance, whilst the Netherlands’ comeback confirmed their preventing spirit.

In conclusion, the Netherlands vs Argentina match turned into a classic stumble upon that showcased the unpredictability and excitement of worldwide soccer. The fit had everything: early goals, dramatic comebacks, penalty shootout drama, and person brilliance. It became a becoming give up to a memorable World Cup quarterfinal.

What made the Netherlands vs Argentina match end the way it ended?